Genealogy of Morality By Friedrich Nietzsche Essay

Genealogy of Morality By Friedrich Nietzsche - study ExampleThis following quotes further supports my opinion pure one ismerely a man who washes himself, who forbids himself certain(a) foods that produce skin ailments, who does not sleep with the dirty women of the lower strata, who has an aversion to blood 4, the concept best is essentially identical with the concept useful 2 ...they designate themselves simply by their superiority in power or by the most clearly visible signs of this superiority3 . With how useful politicians had been to the society, the gracious race undoubtedly sees them as good people and their well-painted reputations have earned them the label of pure one. each these vested superiorities, will earn them much supremacy and help them continue with their propaganda and declare themselves as the good people. An equation is provided by the creditors receiving, in place of a literal compensation for an injury, a recompense in the course of instruction of a kind of pleasurethe pleasure of being allowed to vent his power freely upon one who is powerless, the risque pleasure of doing evil for the pleasure of doing it.. the enjoyment of violation 5.I do not believe that having someone who owes you something wins you all right to vent power over that person. Violation can never be justified by the pleasure a creditor gets from taking advantage or venting power over someone, particularly the debtor. any form of abuse over someone should never be tolerated. The debtor is obliged to pay tho it does entail having to take in any form of physical harm. First of all, it is going to be a violation of human rights. Although the next quote is applicable to some societies, there are certain human laws that defy the authors idea and, in opposition, vie to protect human rights in other communities In weighty the debtor, the creditor participates in a right of the masters at last he, too, may experience for once the majestic sensation of being al lowed to despise and mistreat someone as beneath him or at least, if the demonstrable power and administration of punishment has already passed to the authorities, to see him despised and mistreated. The compensation, then, consists in a warrant for and entitle to cruelty 5. It was here, too, that that uncanny intertwining of the ideas guilt and suffering was first effected-and by now they may well be inseparable 6. With this inseparability, the incorrectness, if not immorality, of using pleasure as a justification for violating someone becomes even more visible and disagreeable. It was never proper to hurt anyone. Even statements like the following could raise eyebrows. On the contrary, let me declare expressly that in the days when mankind was not yet ashamed of its cruelty, life on earth was more cheerful than it is now that pessimists exist. 7