Comparison of Lao Tzu and Machiavelli

Comparison of Lao Tzu and Machiavelli It is obvious to al some sight the differences between blow out of the water and white, light and darkness, or Pepsi and Coca-Cola. some people have diverse preferences for each of these things, as rise up as different views slenderly them. While 1 individual may argue that Pepsi is the eventual(prenominal) weed beverage, an otherwise person may claim that Coca-Cola is the crush by far. This is such the case with numerous different people in this world, on legion(predicate) different topics. A rash moral of contrasting views on many issues is Niccolio Machiavelli and Lao Tzu. Among the issues that they pass oer include struggle and fury and the qualities of an ideal ruler. The issue with the most differences is obviously that of war and violence. In his work The Qualities of a Prince Machiavelli claimed that a good ruler inhering perpetually be prepared for war. Even when their country is not at war, the ruler essentialinessiness be constantly considering combat. They must(prenominal) take the term to well-formed construction at the country in which any battle provide be fought, whether that is in their kingdom or that of their enemies. He must, therefore, never raise his supposition from this exercise of warm and in peacetime he must enlighten himself more than in time of war; this can be done in devil ways, one by action, the other by the mind.

And as far as action is concerned, anyway keeping his soldiers well develop and trained, he must always be out hunting, and must habituate his body to hardships in this manner; and he must likewise learn the genius of the terrain, and know how the mountains slope, how the valleys open, how the plains lie, and understand the reputation of rivers and swamps... (38). Lao Tzus Thoughts from the Tao-Te-Ching took... If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper